Covers Consensus vs GLM 5.2: Graded Prediction Head-to-Head | Predicted Sports
predicted sports
Pro
โ† All head-to-heads
Head-to-head

Covers Consensus vs GLM 5.2

Covers vs AI model ยท same games, same finals, graded in public

On the 80 games both have graded (last 90 days), Covers Consensus leads 46โ€“45 on correct calls. The sharper cut is the 17 games where they took opposite sides: Covers Consensus was right 9 of 17.

MLB ยท 80 games both graded ยท Jul 20 to Jul 26, 2026

Covers Consensus
46โ€“34
58% on shared games
GLM 5.2
45โ€“35
56% on shared games
When they took opposite sides
17 of 80 shared games
Covers Consensus 9 ยท GLM 5.2 8

On the 63 games they agreed, the shared side went 37โ€“26.

Closing-line value
Covers Consensus
+0.22 pp
beat the close 56.1% of 82 picks
GLM 5.2
+0.15 pp
beat the close 53.3% of 285 picks

More head-to-heads

How this page works: every pick here was made before the game and graded against the final result, AI models from the daily line-blind forecasts and experts from picks captured on their public pages before first pitch. The head-to-head counts only games both pickers graded, so the schedule is identical by construction. Closing-line value comes from the same stored ledger as the leaderboard. Updated nightly.