Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GLM 5.2: Graded Prediction Head-to-Head | Predicted Sports
predicted sports
⚡Winning Strategies
← All head-to-heads
Head-to-head

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GLM 5.2

AI model vs AI model · same games, same finals, graded in public

All time Last 30 days Last 90 days

On the 593 games both have graded (all time), Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 350–348 on correct calls. The sharper cut is the 56 games where they took opposite sides: Gemini 3.5 Flash was right 29 of 56.

MLB · 477 games both graded · to

Gemini 3.5 Flash
268–209
56% on shared games
GLM 5.2
268–209
56% on shared games
When they took opposite sides
46 of 477 shared games
Gemini 3.5 Flash 23 · GLM 5.2 23

On the 431 games they agreed, the shared side went –.

UFC · 116 games both graded · to

Gemini 3.5 Flash
82–34
71% on shared games
GLM 5.2
80–36
69% on shared games
When they took opposite sides
10 of 116 shared games
Gemini 3.5 Flash 6 · GLM 5.2 4

On the 106 games they agreed, the shared side went –.

Closing-line value
Gemini 3.5 Flash
+0.19 pp
beat the close 52.9% of 476 picks
GLM 5.2
+0.18 pp
beat the close 54.4% of 853 picks

More head-to-heads

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Claude Opus 4.8 Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Grok 4.5 Gemini 3.5 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Pro Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 5 Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna Pro Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GLM 5.3 Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Gemini 3.6 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Gemini 3.7 Flash
GLM 5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.8 GLM 5.2 vs Grok 4.5 GLM 5.2 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro GLM 5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 5 GLM 5.2 vs GPT-5.6 Luna Pro GLM 5.2 vs GLM 5.3 GLM 5.2 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash GLM 5.2 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

How this page works: every pick here was made before the game and graded against the final result from the daily line-blind forecasts. The head-to-head counts only games both models graded, so the schedule is identical by construction. Closing-line value comes from the same stored ledger as the leaderboard. Updated nightly.