Who is better at picking games, Gemini 3.6 Flash or GLM 5.2?

On the 319 games both have graded, GLM 5.2 leads with 188 wins to 186. Every pick is made before the game and graded in public against the final result.

How often do Gemini 3.6 Flash and GLM 5.2 disagree?

They took opposite sides on 18 of the 319 shared games, and GLM 5.2 was right 10 of those 18 times.

← All head-to-heads

Head-to-head

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs GLM 5.2

AI model vs AI model · same games, same finals, graded in public

All time Last 30 days Last 90 days

On the 319 games both have graded (all time), GLM 5.2 leads 188–186 on correct calls. The sharper cut is the 18 games where they took opposite sides: GLM 5.2 was right 10 of 18.

MLB · 281 games both graded · Jul 24 to Aug 13, 2026

Gemini 3.6 Flash

157–124

56% on shared games

GLM 5.2

160–121

57% on shared games

When they took opposite sides

13 of 281 shared games

Gemini 3.6 Flash 5 · GLM 5.2 8

On the 268 games they agreed, the shared side went 152–116.

UFC · 38 games both graded · Jul 25 to Aug 8, 2026

Gemini 3.6 Flash

29–9

76% on shared games

GLM 5.2

28–10

74% on shared games

When they took opposite sides

5 of 38 shared games

Gemini 3.6 Flash 3 · GLM 5.2 2

On the 33 games they agreed, the shared side went 26–7.

Closing-line value

Gemini 3.6 Flash

+0.30 pp

beat the close 53.5% of 282 picks

GLM 5.2

+0.22 pp

beat the close 53.9% of 523 picks

More head-to-heads

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Claude Opus 4.8 Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Grok 4.5 Gemini 3.6 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Pro Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 5 Gemini 3.6 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna Pro Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Kimi K3 Gemini 3.6 Flash vs CBS Sports Staff Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Covers Consensus

GLM 5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.8 GLM 5.2 vs Grok 4.5 GLM 5.2 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro GLM 5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 5 GLM 5.2 vs GPT-5.6 Luna Pro GLM 5.2 vs Kimi K3 GLM 5.2 vs CBS Sports Staff GLM 5.2 vs Covers Consensus

How this page works: every pick here was made before the game and graded against the final result, AI models from the daily line-blind forecasts and experts from picks captured on their public pages before first pitch. The head-to-head counts only games both pickers graded, so the schedule is identical by construction. Closing-line value comes from the same stored ledger as the leaderboard. Updated nightly.