Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GLM 5.2: Graded Prediction Head-to-Head | Predicted Sports
predicted sports
⚡Winning Strategies
← All head-to-heads
Head-to-head

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GLM 5.2

AI model vs AI model · same games, same finals, graded in public

All time Last 30 days Last 90 days

On the 415 games both have graded (all time), GLM 5.2 leads 248–243 on correct calls. The sharper cut is the 29 games where they took opposite sides: GLM 5.2 was right 17 of 29.

MLB · 362 games both graded · to

Gemini 3.7 Flash
211–151
58% on shared games
GLM 5.2
217–145
60% on shared games
When they took opposite sides
22 of 362 shared games
Gemini 3.7 Flash 8 · GLM 5.2 14

On the 340 games they agreed, the shared side went –.

UFC · 53 games both graded · to

Gemini 3.7 Flash
32–21
60% on shared games
GLM 5.2
31–22
58% on shared games
When they took opposite sides
7 of 53 shared games
Gemini 3.7 Flash 4 · GLM 5.2 3

On the 46 games they agreed, the shared side went –.

Closing-line value
Gemini 3.7 Flash
+0.14 pp
beat the close 56.6% of 366 picks
GLM 5.2
+0.20 pp
beat the close 55.3% of 923 picks

More head-to-heads

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Claude Opus 4.8 Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Grok 4.5 Gemini 3.7 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Pro Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 5 Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna Pro Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GLM 5.3 Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Gemini 3.6 Flash
GLM 5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.8 GLM 5.2 vs Grok 4.5 GLM 5.2 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro GLM 5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 5 GLM 5.2 vs GPT-5.6 Luna Pro GLM 5.2 vs GLM 5.3 GLM 5.2 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

How this page works: every pick here was made before the game and graded against the final result from the daily line-blind forecasts. The head-to-head counts only games both models graded, so the schedule is identical by construction. Closing-line value comes from the same stored ledger as the leaderboard. Updated nightly.