GPT-5.6 Luna Pro vs GLM 5.2: Graded Prediction Head-to-Head | Predicted Sports
predicted sports
Pro
← All head-to-heads
Head-to-head

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro vs GLM 5.2

AI model vs AI model · same games, same finals, graded in public

On the 383 games both have graded (all time), GPT-5.6 Luna Pro leads 229–225 on correct calls. The sharper cut is the 28 games where they took opposite sides: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro was right 16 of 28.

MLB · 331 games both graded · Jul 10 to Aug 6, 2026

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro
190–141
57% on shared games
GLM 5.2
186–145
56% on shared games
When they took opposite sides
26 of 331 shared games
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro 15 · GLM 5.2 11

On the 305 games they agreed, the shared side went 175–130.

UFC · 52 games both graded · Jul 11 to Aug 1, 2026

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro
39–13
75% on shared games
GLM 5.2
39–13
75% on shared games
When they took opposite sides
2 of 52 shared games
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro 1 · GLM 5.2 1

On the 50 games they agreed, the shared side went 38–12.

Closing-line value
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro
+0.35 pp
beat the close 56.8% of 331 picks
GLM 5.2
+0.25 pp
beat the close 54.3% of 431 picks

More head-to-heads

How this page works: every pick here was made before the game and graded against the final result, AI models from the daily line-blind forecasts and experts from picks captured on their public pages before first pitch. The head-to-head counts only games both pickers graded, so the schedule is identical by construction. Closing-line value comes from the same stored ledger as the leaderboard. Updated nightly.