GPT-5.6 Luna Pro vs GLM 5.2: Graded Prediction Head-to-Head | Predicted Sports
predicted sports
Pro
← All head-to-heads
Head-to-head

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro vs GLM 5.2

AI model vs AI model · same games, same finals, graded in public

On the 222 games both have graded (all time), GPT-5.6 Luna Pro leads 130–128 on correct calls. The sharper cut is the 18 games where they took opposite sides: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro was right 10 of 18.

MLB · 184 games both graded · Jul 10 to Jul 26, 2026

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro
101–83
55% on shared games
GLM 5.2
98–86
53% on shared games
When they took opposite sides
17 of 184 shared games
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro 10 · GLM 5.2 7

On the 167 games they agreed, the shared side went 91–76.

UFC · 38 games both graded · Jul 11 to Jul 25, 2026

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro
29–9
76% on shared games
GLM 5.2
30–8
79% on shared games
When they took opposite sides
1 of 38 shared games
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro 0 · GLM 5.2 1

On the 37 games they agreed, the shared side went 29–8.

Closing-line value
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro
+0.26 pp
beat the close 57.3% of 185 picks
GLM 5.2
+0.15 pp
beat the close 53.3% of 285 picks

More head-to-heads

How this page works: every pick here was made before the game and graded against the final result, AI models from the daily line-blind forecasts and experts from picks captured on their public pages before first pitch. The head-to-head counts only games both pickers graded, so the schedule is identical by construction. Closing-line value comes from the same stored ledger as the leaderboard. Updated nightly.