GPT-5.6 Luna Pro vs GLM 5.2: Graded Prediction Head-to-Head | Predicted Sports
predicted sports
← All head-to-heads
Head-to-head

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro vs GLM 5.2

AI model vs AI model · same games, same finals, graded in public

On the 419 games both have graded (last 30 days), GLM 5.2 leads 242–238 on correct calls. The sharper cut is the 28 games where they took opposite sides: GLM 5.2 was right 16 of 28.

MLB · 367 games both graded · to

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro
210–157
57% on shared games
GLM 5.2
211–156
57% on shared games
When they took opposite sides
23 of 367 shared games
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro 11 · GLM 5.2 12

On the 344 games they agreed, the shared side went –.

UFC · 52 games both graded · to

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro
28–24
54% on shared games
GLM 5.2
31–21
60% on shared games
When they took opposite sides
5 of 52 shared games
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro 1 · GLM 5.2 4

On the 47 games they agreed, the shared side went –.

Closing-line value
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro
+0.20 pp
beat the close 55.3% of 761 picks
GLM 5.2
+0.18 pp
beat the close 54.4% of 853 picks

More head-to-heads

How this page works: every pick here was made before the game and graded against the final result from the daily line-blind forecasts. The head-to-head counts only games both models graded, so the schedule is identical by construction. Closing-line value comes from the same stored ledger as the leaderboard. Updated nightly.