GPT-5.6 Luna Pro vs GLM 5.2: Graded Prediction Head-to-Head | Predicted Sports
predicted sports
← All head-to-heads
Head-to-head

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro vs GLM 5.2

AI model vs AI model · same games, same finals, graded in public

On the 869 games both have graded (last 90 days), GPT-5.6 Luna Pro leads 507–506 on correct calls. The sharper cut is the 59 games where they took opposite sides: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro was right 30 of 59.

MLB · 753 games both graded · to

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro
430–323
57% on shared games
GLM 5.2
426–327
57% on shared games
When they took opposite sides
52 of 753 shared games
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro 28 · GLM 5.2 24

On the 701 games they agreed, the shared side went –.

UFC · 116 games both graded · to

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro
77–39
66% on shared games
GLM 5.2
80–36
69% on shared games
When they took opposite sides
7 of 116 shared games
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro 2 · GLM 5.2 5

On the 109 games they agreed, the shared side went –.

Closing-line value
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro
+0.20 pp
beat the close 55.3% of 761 picks
GLM 5.2
+0.18 pp
beat the close 54.4% of 853 picks

More head-to-heads

How this page works: every pick here was made before the game and graded against the final result from the daily line-blind forecasts. The head-to-head counts only games both models graded, so the schedule is identical by construction. Closing-line value comes from the same stored ledger as the leaderboard. Updated nightly.