GPT-5.6 Luna Pro vs Gemini 3.7 Flash: Graded Prediction Head-to-Head | Predicted Sports
predicted sports
← All head-to-heads
Head-to-head

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

AI model vs AI model · same games, same finals, graded in public

On the 415 games both have graded (all time), GPT-5.6 Luna Pro leads 246–243 on correct calls. The sharper cut is the 29 games where they took opposite sides: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro was right 16 of 29.

MLB · 362 games both graded · to

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro
217–145
60% on shared games
Gemini 3.7 Flash
211–151
58% on shared games
When they took opposite sides
20 of 362 shared games
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro 13 · Gemini 3.7 Flash 7

On the 342 games they agreed, the shared side went –.

UFC · 53 games both graded · to

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro
29–24
55% on shared games
Gemini 3.7 Flash
32–21
60% on shared games
When they took opposite sides
9 of 53 shared games
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro 3 · Gemini 3.7 Flash 6

On the 44 games they agreed, the shared side went –.

Closing-line value
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro
+0.22 pp
beat the close 56.3% of 831 picks
Gemini 3.7 Flash
+0.14 pp
beat the close 56.6% of 366 picks

More head-to-heads

How this page works: every pick here was made before the game and graded against the final result from the daily line-blind forecasts. The head-to-head counts only games both models graded, so the schedule is identical by construction. Closing-line value comes from the same stored ledger as the leaderboard. Updated nightly.