GPT-5.6 Luna Pro vs Claude Opus 4.8: Graded Prediction Head-to-Head | Predicted Sports
predicted sports
Pro
← All head-to-heads
Head-to-head

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro vs Claude Opus 4.8

AI model vs AI model · same games, same finals, graded in public

On the 480 games both have graded (all time), Claude Opus 4.8 leads 289–285 on correct calls. The sharper cut is the 54 games where they took opposite sides: Claude Opus 4.8 was right 29 of 54.

MLB · 416 games both graded · Jul 10 to Aug 12, 2026

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro
236–180
57% on shared games
Claude Opus 4.8
239–177
57% on shared games
When they took opposite sides
43 of 416 shared games
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro 20 · Claude Opus 4.8 23

On the 373 games they agreed, the shared side went 216–157.

UFC · 64 games both graded · Jul 11 to Aug 8, 2026

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro
49–15
77% on shared games
Claude Opus 4.8
50–14
78% on shared games
When they took opposite sides
11 of 64 shared games
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro 5 · Claude Opus 4.8 6

On the 53 games they agreed, the shared side went 44–9.

Closing-line value
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro
+0.30 pp
beat the close 56.3% of 416 picks
Claude Opus 4.8
+0.26 pp
beat the close 54.8% of 516 picks

More head-to-heads

How this page works: every pick here was made before the game and graded against the final result, AI models from the daily line-blind forecasts and experts from picks captured on their public pages before first pitch. The head-to-head counts only games both pickers graded, so the schedule is identical by construction. Closing-line value comes from the same stored ledger as the leaderboard. Updated nightly.