GPT-5.6 Luna Pro vs Gemini 3.7 Flash: Graded Prediction Head-to-Head | Predicted Sports
predicted sports
← All head-to-heads
Head-to-head

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

AI model vs AI model · same games, same finals, graded in public

On the 336 games both have graded (last 90 days), GPT-5.6 Luna Pro leads 199–196 on correct calls. The sharper cut is the 23 games where they took opposite sides: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro was right 13 of 23.

MLB · 296 games both graded · to

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro
177–119
60% on shared games
Gemini 3.7 Flash
173–123
58% on shared games
When they took opposite sides
16 of 296 shared games
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro 10 · Gemini 3.7 Flash 6

On the 280 games they agreed, the shared side went –.

UFC · 40 games both graded · to

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro
22–18
55% on shared games
Gemini 3.7 Flash
23–17
58% on shared games
When they took opposite sides
7 of 40 shared games
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro 3 · Gemini 3.7 Flash 4

On the 33 games they agreed, the shared side went –.

Closing-line value
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro
+0.20 pp
beat the close 55.3% of 761 picks
Gemini 3.7 Flash
+0.08 pp
beat the close 54.7% of 296 picks

More head-to-heads

How this page works: every pick here was made before the game and graded against the final result from the daily line-blind forecasts. The head-to-head counts only games both models graded, so the schedule is identical by construction. Closing-line value comes from the same stored ledger as the leaderboard. Updated nightly.