DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM 5.2: Graded Prediction Head-to-Head | Predicted Sports
predicted sports
Pro
← All head-to-heads
Head-to-head

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM 5.2

AI model vs AI model · same games, same finals, graded in public

On the 277 games both have graded (all time), they are dead even at 160 correct calls each. The sharper cut is the 26 games where they took opposite sides: they split them exactly, 13 apiece.

MLB · 239 games both graded · Jul 2 to Jul 26, 2026

DeepSeek V4 Pro
130–109
54% on shared games
GLM 5.2
130–109
54% on shared games
When they took opposite sides
24 of 239 shared games
DeepSeek V4 Pro 12 · GLM 5.2 12

On the 215 games they agreed, the shared side went 118–97.

UFC · 38 games both graded · Jul 11 to Jul 25, 2026

DeepSeek V4 Pro
30–8
79% on shared games
GLM 5.2
30–8
79% on shared games
When they took opposite sides
2 of 38 shared games
DeepSeek V4 Pro 1 · GLM 5.2 1

On the 36 games they agreed, the shared side went 29–7.

Closing-line value
DeepSeek V4 Pro
+0.20 pp
beat the close 57.1% of 240 picks
GLM 5.2
+0.15 pp
beat the close 53.3% of 285 picks

More head-to-heads

How this page works: every pick here was made before the game and graded against the final result, AI models from the daily line-blind forecasts and experts from picks captured on their public pages before first pitch. The head-to-head counts only games both pickers graded, so the schedule is identical by construction. Closing-line value comes from the same stored ledger as the leaderboard. Updated nightly.