Who is better at picking games, DeepSeek V4 Pro or GLM 5.2?

On the 428 games both have graded, DeepSeek V4 Pro leads with 256 wins to 252. Every pick is made before the game and graded in public against the final result.

How often do DeepSeek V4 Pro and GLM 5.2 disagree?

They took opposite sides on 36 of the 428 shared games, and DeepSeek V4 Pro was right 20 of those 36 times.

← All head-to-heads

Head-to-head

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM 5.2

AI model vs AI model · same games, same finals, graded in public

All time Last 30 days Last 90 days

On the 428 games both have graded (all time), DeepSeek V4 Pro leads 256–252 on correct calls. The sharper cut is the 36 games where they took opposite sides: DeepSeek V4 Pro was right 20 of 36.

MLB · 376 games both graded · Jul 2 to Aug 6, 2026

DeepSeek V4 Pro

215–161

57% on shared games

GLM 5.2

213–163

57% on shared games

When they took opposite sides

32 of 376 shared games

DeepSeek V4 Pro 17 · GLM 5.2 15

On the 344 games they agreed, the shared side went 198–146.

UFC · 52 games both graded · Jul 11 to Aug 1, 2026

DeepSeek V4 Pro

41–11

79% on shared games

GLM 5.2

39–13

75% on shared games

When they took opposite sides

4 of 52 shared games

DeepSeek V4 Pro 3 · GLM 5.2 1

On the 48 games they agreed, the shared side went 38–10.

Closing-line value

DeepSeek V4 Pro

+0.28 pp

beat the close 56.9% of 376 picks

GLM 5.2

+0.25 pp

beat the close 54.3% of 431 picks

More head-to-heads

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Claude Opus 4.8 DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Gemini 3.5 Flash DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Grok 4.5 DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Claude Sonnet 5 DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GPT-5.6 Luna Pro DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Gemini 3.6 Flash DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Claude Opus 5

GLM 5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.8 GLM 5.2 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash GLM 5.2 vs Grok 4.5 GLM 5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 5 GLM 5.2 vs GPT-5.6 Luna Pro GLM 5.2 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite GLM 5.2 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash GLM 5.2 vs Claude Opus 5

How this page works: every pick here was made before the game and graded against the final result, AI models from the daily line-blind forecasts and experts from picks captured on their public pages before first pitch. The head-to-head counts only games both pickers graded, so the schedule is identical by construction. Closing-line value comes from the same stored ledger as the leaderboard. Updated nightly.