DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM 5.2: Graded Prediction Head-to-Head | Predicted Sports
predicted sports
← All head-to-heads
Head-to-head

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM 5.2

AI model vs AI model · same games, same finals, graded in public

On the 400 games both have graded (last 30 days), GLM 5.2 leads 234–224 on correct calls. The sharper cut is the 42 games where they took opposite sides: GLM 5.2 was right 26 of 42.

MLB · 348 games both graded · to

DeepSeek V4 Pro
199–149
57% on shared games
GLM 5.2
203–145
58% on shared games
When they took opposite sides
36 of 348 shared games
DeepSeek V4 Pro 16 · GLM 5.2 20

On the 312 games they agreed, the shared side went –.

UFC · 52 games both graded · to

DeepSeek V4 Pro
25–27
48% on shared games
GLM 5.2
31–21
60% on shared games
When they took opposite sides
6 of 52 shared games
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0 · GLM 5.2 6

On the 46 games they agreed, the shared side went –.

Closing-line value
DeepSeek V4 Pro
+0.18 pp
beat the close 54.7% of 774 picks
GLM 5.2
+0.18 pp
beat the close 54.4% of 853 picks

More head-to-heads

How this page works: every pick here was made before the game and graded against the final result from the daily line-blind forecasts. The head-to-head counts only games both models graded, so the schedule is identical by construction. Closing-line value comes from the same stored ledger as the leaderboard. Updated nightly.