GPT-5.6 Sol Pro vs Covers Consensus: Graded Prediction Head-to-Head | Predicted Sports
predicted sports
Pro
โ† All head-to-heads
Head-to-head

GPT-5.6 Sol Pro vs Covers Consensus

AI model vs Covers ยท same games, same finals, graded in public

On the 80 games both have graded (all time), Covers Consensus leads 46โ€“45 on correct calls. The sharper cut is the 13 games where they took opposite sides: Covers Consensus was right 7 of 13.

MLB ยท 80 games both graded ยท Jul 20 to Jul 26, 2026

GPT-5.6 Sol Pro
45โ€“35
56% on shared games
Covers Consensus
46โ€“34
58% on shared games
When they took opposite sides
13 of 80 shared games
GPT-5.6 Sol Pro 6 ยท Covers Consensus 7

On the 67 games they agreed, the shared side went 39โ€“28.

Closing-line value
GPT-5.6 Sol Pro
+0.27 pp
beat the close 58.2% of 184 picks
Covers Consensus
+0.22 pp
beat the close 56.1% of 82 picks

More head-to-heads

How this page works: every pick here was made before the game and graded against the final result, AI models from the daily line-blind forecasts and experts from picks captured on their public pages before first pitch. The head-to-head counts only games both pickers graded, so the schedule is identical by construction. Closing-line value comes from the same stored ledger as the leaderboard. Updated nightly.