GPT-5.6 Luna Pro vs Covers Consensus: Graded Prediction Head-to-Head | Predicted Sports
predicted sports
Pro
โ† All head-to-heads
Head-to-head

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro vs Covers Consensus

AI model vs Covers ยท same games, same finals, graded in public

On the 283 games both have graded (all time), they are dead even at 160 correct calls each. The sharper cut is the 38 games where they took opposite sides: they split them exactly, 19 apiece.

MLB ยท 283 games both graded ยท Jul 20 to Aug 13, 2026

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro
160โ€“123
57% on shared games
Covers Consensus
160โ€“123
57% on shared games
When they took opposite sides
38 of 283 shared games
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro 19 ยท Covers Consensus 19

On the 245 games they agreed, the shared side went 141โ€“104.

Closing-line value
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro
+0.30 pp
beat the close 56.0% of 423 picks
Covers Consensus
+0.23 pp
beat the close 53.3% of 285 picks

More head-to-heads

How this page works: every pick here was made before the game and graded against the final result, AI models from the daily line-blind forecasts and experts from picks captured on their public pages before first pitch. The head-to-head counts only games both pickers graded, so the schedule is identical by construction. Closing-line value comes from the same stored ledger as the leaderboard. Updated nightly.