GPT-5.6 Luna Pro vs Covers Consensus: Graded Prediction Head-to-Head | Predicted Sports
predicted sports
Pro
โ† All head-to-heads
Head-to-head

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro vs Covers Consensus

AI model vs Covers ยท same games, same finals, graded in public

On the 80 games both have graded (last 90 days), they are dead even at 46 correct calls each. The sharper cut is the 14 games where they took opposite sides: they split them exactly, 7 apiece.

MLB ยท 80 games both graded ยท Jul 20 to Jul 26, 2026

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro
46โ€“34
58% on shared games
Covers Consensus
46โ€“34
58% on shared games
When they took opposite sides
14 of 80 shared games
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro 7 ยท Covers Consensus 7

On the 66 games they agreed, the shared side went 39โ€“27.

Closing-line value
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro
+0.26 pp
beat the close 57.3% of 185 picks
Covers Consensus
+0.22 pp
beat the close 56.1% of 82 picks

More head-to-heads

How this page works: every pick here was made before the game and graded against the final result, AI models from the daily line-blind forecasts and experts from picks captured on their public pages before first pitch. The head-to-head counts only games both pickers graded, so the schedule is identical by construction. Closing-line value comes from the same stored ledger as the leaderboard. Updated nightly.