Covers Consensus vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: Graded Prediction Head-to-Head | Predicted Sports
predicted sports
Pro
โ† All head-to-heads
Head-to-head

Covers Consensus vs DeepSeek V4 Pro

Covers vs AI model ยท same games, same finals, graded in public

On the 77 games both have graded (all time), Covers Consensus leads 45โ€“44 on correct calls. The sharper cut is the 17 games where they took opposite sides: Covers Consensus was right 9 of 17.

MLB ยท 77 games both graded ยท Jul 20 to Jul 26, 2026

Covers Consensus
45โ€“32
58% on shared games
DeepSeek V4 Pro
44โ€“33
57% on shared games
When they took opposite sides
17 of 77 shared games
Covers Consensus 9 ยท DeepSeek V4 Pro 8

On the 60 games they agreed, the shared side went 36โ€“24.

Closing-line value
Covers Consensus
+0.22 pp
beat the close 56.1% of 82 picks
DeepSeek V4 Pro
+0.20 pp
beat the close 57.1% of 240 picks

More head-to-heads

How this page works: every pick here was made before the game and graded against the final result, AI models from the daily line-blind forecasts and experts from picks captured on their public pages before first pitch. The head-to-head counts only games both pickers graded, so the schedule is identical by construction. Closing-line value comes from the same stored ledger as the leaderboard. Updated nightly.