Covers Consensus vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: Graded Prediction Head-to-Head | Predicted Sports
predicted sports
Pro
โ† All head-to-heads
Head-to-head

Covers Consensus vs DeepSeek V4 Pro

Covers vs AI model ยท same games, same finals, graded in public

On the 197 games both have graded (all time), DeepSeek V4 Pro leads 116โ€“114 on correct calls. The sharper cut is the 30 games where they took opposite sides: DeepSeek V4 Pro was right 16 of 30.

MLB ยท 197 games both graded ยท Jul 20 to Aug 6, 2026

Covers Consensus
114โ€“83
58% on shared games
DeepSeek V4 Pro
116โ€“81
59% on shared games
When they took opposite sides
30 of 197 shared games
Covers Consensus 14 ยท DeepSeek V4 Pro 16

On the 167 games they agreed, the shared side went 100โ€“67.

Closing-line value
Covers Consensus
+0.22 pp
beat the close 53.6% of 207 picks
DeepSeek V4 Pro
+0.28 pp
beat the close 56.9% of 376 picks

More head-to-heads

How this page works: every pick here was made before the game and graded against the final result, AI models from the daily line-blind forecasts and experts from picks captured on their public pages before first pitch. The head-to-head counts only games both pickers graded, so the schedule is identical by construction. Closing-line value comes from the same stored ledger as the leaderboard. Updated nightly.