Covers Consensus vs GLM 5.2: Graded Prediction Head-to-Head | Predicted Sports
predicted sports
Pro
โ† All head-to-heads
Head-to-head

Covers Consensus vs GLM 5.2

Covers vs AI model ยท same games, same finals, graded in public

On the 206 games both have graded (all time), they are dead even at 117 correct calls each. The sharper cut is the 28 games where they took opposite sides: they split them exactly, 14 apiece.

MLB ยท 206 games both graded ยท Jul 20 to Aug 6, 2026

Covers Consensus
117โ€“89
57% on shared games
GLM 5.2
117โ€“89
57% on shared games
When they took opposite sides
28 of 206 shared games
Covers Consensus 14 ยท GLM 5.2 14

On the 178 games they agreed, the shared side went 103โ€“75.

Closing-line value
Covers Consensus
+0.22 pp
beat the close 53.6% of 207 picks
GLM 5.2
+0.25 pp
beat the close 54.3% of 431 picks

More head-to-heads

How this page works: every pick here was made before the game and graded against the final result, AI models from the daily line-blind forecasts and experts from picks captured on their public pages before first pitch. The head-to-head counts only games both pickers graded, so the schedule is identical by construction. Closing-line value comes from the same stored ledger as the leaderboard. Updated nightly.