Who is better at picking games, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or GLM 5.2?

On the 55 games both have graded, GLM 5.2 leads with 34 wins to 32. Every pick is made before the game and graded in public against the final result.

How often do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GLM 5.2 disagree?

They took opposite sides on 2 of the 55 shared games, and GLM 5.2 was right 2 of those 2 times.

← All head-to-heads

Head-to-head

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs GLM 5.2

AI model vs AI model · same games, same finals, graded in public

All time Last 30 days Last 90 days

On the 55 games both have graded (all time), GLM 5.2 leads 34–32 on correct calls. They have only disagreed 2 times so far, too few to read.

MLB · 43 games both graded · Jul 24 to Jul 26, 2026

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

24–19

56% on shared games

GLM 5.2

25–18

58% on shared games

When they took opposite sides

1 of 43 shared games

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 0 · GLM 5.2 1

On the 42 games they agreed, the shared side went 24–18.

UFC · 12 games both graded · Jul 25 to Jul 25, 2026

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

8–4

67% on shared games

GLM 5.2

9–3

75% on shared games

When they took opposite sides

1 of 12 shared games

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 0 · GLM 5.2 1

On the 11 games they agreed, the shared side went 8–3.

Closing-line value

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

-0.13 pp

beat the close 47.7% of 44 picks

GLM 5.2

+0.15 pp

beat the close 53.3% of 285 picks

More head-to-heads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Claude Opus 4.8 Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Grok 4.5 Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs DeepSeek V4 Pro Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Claude Sonnet 5 Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs GPT-5.6 Sol Pro Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs GPT-5.6 Luna Pro Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

GLM 5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.8 GLM 5.2 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash GLM 5.2 vs Grok 4.5 GLM 5.2 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro GLM 5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 5 GLM 5.2 vs GPT-5.6 Sol Pro GLM 5.2 vs GPT-5.6 Luna Pro GLM 5.2 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

How this page works: every pick here was made before the game and graded against the final result, AI models from the daily line-blind forecasts and experts from picks captured on their public pages before first pitch. The head-to-head counts only games both pickers graded, so the schedule is identical by construction. Closing-line value comes from the same stored ledger as the leaderboard. Updated nightly.