Claude Opus 4.8 vs GLM 5.2: Graded Prediction Head-to-Head | Predicted Sports
predicted sports
⚡Winning Strategies
← All head-to-heads
Head-to-head

Claude Opus 4.8 vs GLM 5.2

AI model vs AI model · same games, same finals, graded in public

All time Last 30 days Last 90 days

On the 388 games both have graded (last 30 days), GLM 5.2 leads 223–213 on correct calls. The sharper cut is the 32 games where they took opposite sides: GLM 5.2 was right 21 of 32.

MLB · 363 games both graded · to

Claude Opus 4.8
200–163
55% on shared games
GLM 5.2
208–155
57% on shared games
When they took opposite sides
30 of 363 shared games
Claude Opus 4.8 11 · GLM 5.2 19

On the 333 games they agreed, the shared side went –.

UFC · 25 games both graded · to

Claude Opus 4.8
13–12
52% on shared games
GLM 5.2
15–10
60% on shared games
When they took opposite sides
2 of 25 shared games
Claude Opus 4.8 0 · GLM 5.2 2

On the 23 games they agreed, the shared side went –.

Closing-line value
Claude Opus 4.8
+0.20 pp
beat the close 54.9% of 849 picks
GLM 5.2
+0.18 pp
beat the close 54.4% of 853 picks

More head-to-heads

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Grok 4.5 Claude Opus 4.8 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Sonnet 5 Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.6 Luna Pro Claude Opus 4.8 vs GLM 5.3 Claude Opus 4.8 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash Claude Opus 4.8 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash
GLM 5.2 vs Grok 4.5 GLM 5.2 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro GLM 5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 5 GLM 5.2 vs GPT-5.6 Luna Pro GLM 5.2 vs GLM 5.3 GLM 5.2 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash GLM 5.2 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

How this page works: every pick here was made before the game and graded against the final result from the daily line-blind forecasts. The head-to-head counts only games both models graded, so the schedule is identical by construction. Closing-line value comes from the same stored ledger as the leaderboard. Updated nightly.