Who is better at picking games, Claude Sonnet 5 or GLM 5.2?

On the 323 games both have graded, Claude Sonnet 5 leads with 196 wins to 186. Every pick is made before the game and graded in public against the final result.

How often do Claude Sonnet 5 and GLM 5.2 disagree?

They took opposite sides on 32 of the 323 shared games, and Claude Sonnet 5 was right 21 of those 32 times.

← All head-to-heads

Head-to-head

Claude Sonnet 5 vs GLM 5.2

AI model vs AI model · same games, same finals, graded in public

All time Last 30 days Last 90 days

On the 323 games both have graded (last 90 days), Claude Sonnet 5 leads 196–186 on correct calls. The sharper cut is the 32 games where they took opposite sides: Claude Sonnet 5 was right 21 of 32.

MLB · 285 games both graded · Jul 2 to Jul 26, 2026

Claude Sonnet 5

164–121

58% on shared games

GLM 5.2

156–129

55% on shared games

When they took opposite sides

30 of 285 shared games

Claude Sonnet 5 19 · GLM 5.2 11

On the 255 games they agreed, the shared side went 145–110.

UFC · 38 games both graded · Jul 11 to Jul 25, 2026

Claude Sonnet 5

32–6

84% on shared games

GLM 5.2

30–8

79% on shared games

When they took opposite sides

2 of 38 shared games

Claude Sonnet 5 2 · GLM 5.2 0

On the 36 games they agreed, the shared side went 30–6.

Closing-line value

Claude Sonnet 5

+0.16 pp

beat the close 55.1% of 285 picks

GLM 5.2

+0.15 pp

beat the close 53.3% of 285 picks

More head-to-heads

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Claude Sonnet 5 vs Grok 4.5 Claude Sonnet 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro Claude Sonnet 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol Pro Claude Sonnet 5 vs GPT-5.6 Luna Pro Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

GLM 5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.8 GLM 5.2 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash GLM 5.2 vs Grok 4.5 GLM 5.2 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro GLM 5.2 vs GPT-5.6 Sol Pro GLM 5.2 vs GPT-5.6 Luna Pro GLM 5.2 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite GLM 5.2 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

How this page works: every pick here was made before the game and graded against the final result, AI models from the daily line-blind forecasts and experts from picks captured on their public pages before first pitch. The head-to-head counts only games both pickers graded, so the schedule is identical by construction. Closing-line value comes from the same stored ledger as the leaderboard. Updated nightly.