Who is better at picking games, ESPN BPI or GLM 5.2?

On the 181 games both have graded, GLM 5.2 leads with 103 wins to 96. Every pick is made before the game and graded in public against the final result.

How often do ESPN BPI and GLM 5.2 disagree?

They took opposite sides on 31 of the 181 shared games, and GLM 5.2 was right 19 of those 31 times.

← All head-to-heads

Head-to-head

ESPN BPI vs GLM 5.2

ESPN vs AI model · same games, same finals, graded in public

All time Last 30 days Last 90 days

On the 181 games both have graded (all time), GLM 5.2 leads 103–96 on correct calls. The sharper cut is the 31 games where they took opposite sides: GLM 5.2 was right 19 of 31.

MLB · 181 games both graded · Jul 21 to Aug 3, 2026

ESPN BPI

96–85

53% on shared games

GLM 5.2

103–78

57% on shared games

When they took opposite sides

31 of 181 shared games

ESPN BPI 12 · GLM 5.2 19

On the 150 games they agreed, the shared side went 84–66.

Closing-line value

ESPN BPI

+0.35 pp

beat the close 60.4% of 182 picks

GLM 5.2

+0.25 pp

beat the close 54.3% of 431 picks

More head-to-heads

ESPN BPI vs Claude Opus 4.8 ESPN BPI vs Gemini 3.5 Flash ESPN BPI vs Grok 4.5 ESPN BPI vs DeepSeek V4 Pro ESPN BPI vs Claude Sonnet 5 ESPN BPI vs GPT-5.6 Luna Pro ESPN BPI vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite ESPN BPI vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

GLM 5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.8 GLM 5.2 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash GLM 5.2 vs Grok 4.5 GLM 5.2 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro GLM 5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 5 GLM 5.2 vs GPT-5.6 Luna Pro GLM 5.2 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite GLM 5.2 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

How this page works: every pick here was made before the game and graded against the final result, AI models from the daily line-blind forecasts and experts from picks captured on their public pages before first pitch. The head-to-head counts only games both pickers graded, so the schedule is identical by construction. Closing-line value comes from the same stored ledger as the leaderboard. Updated nightly.