Who is better at picking games, Dimers or GLM 5.2?

On the 236 games both have graded, GLM 5.2 leads with 136 wins to 134. Every pick is made before the game and graded in public against the final result.

How often do Dimers and GLM 5.2 disagree?

They took opposite sides on 38 of the 236 shared games, and GLM 5.2 was right 20 of those 38 times.

← All head-to-heads

Head-to-head

Dimers vs GLM 5.2

Dimers vs AI model · same games, same finals, graded in public

All time Last 30 days Last 90 days

On the 236 games both have graded (all time), GLM 5.2 leads 136–134 on correct calls. The sharper cut is the 38 games where they took opposite sides: GLM 5.2 was right 20 of 38.

MLB · 236 games both graded · Jul 20 to Aug 6, 2026

Dimers

134–102

57% on shared games

GLM 5.2

136–100

58% on shared games

When they took opposite sides

38 of 236 shared games

Dimers 18 · GLM 5.2 20

On the 198 games they agreed, the shared side went 116–82.

Closing-line value

Dimers

+0.32 pp

beat the close 57.4% of 237 picks

GLM 5.2

+0.25 pp

beat the close 54.3% of 431 picks

More head-to-heads

Dimers vs Claude Opus 4.8 Dimers vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Dimers vs Grok 4.5 Dimers vs DeepSeek V4 Pro Dimers vs Claude Sonnet 5 Dimers vs GPT-5.6 Luna Pro Dimers vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Dimers vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

GLM 5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.8 GLM 5.2 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash GLM 5.2 vs Grok 4.5 GLM 5.2 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro GLM 5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 5 GLM 5.2 vs GPT-5.6 Luna Pro GLM 5.2 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite GLM 5.2 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

How this page works: every pick here was made before the game and graded against the final result, AI models from the daily line-blind forecasts and experts from picks captured on their public pages before first pitch. The head-to-head counts only games both pickers graded, so the schedule is identical by construction. Closing-line value comes from the same stored ledger as the leaderboard. Updated nightly.