GPT-5.6 Luna Pro vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: Graded Prediction Head-to-Head | Predicted Sports
predicted sports
Pro
← All head-to-heads
Head-to-head

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro vs DeepSeek V4 Pro

AI model vs AI model · same games, same finals, graded in public

On the 195 games both have graded (last 30 days), GPT-5.6 Luna Pro leads 115–112 on correct calls. The sharper cut is the 21 games where they took opposite sides: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro was right 12 of 21.

MLB · 157 games both graded · Jul 10 to Jul 26, 2026

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro
86–71
55% on shared games
DeepSeek V4 Pro
82–75
52% on shared games
When they took opposite sides
18 of 157 shared games
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro 11 · DeepSeek V4 Pro 7

On the 139 games they agreed, the shared side went 75–64.

UFC · 38 games both graded · Jul 11 to Jul 25, 2026

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro
29–9
76% on shared games
DeepSeek V4 Pro
30–8
79% on shared games
When they took opposite sides
3 of 38 shared games
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro 1 · DeepSeek V4 Pro 2

On the 35 games they agreed, the shared side went 28–7.

Closing-line value
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro
+0.26 pp
beat the close 57.3% of 185 picks
DeepSeek V4 Pro
+0.20 pp
beat the close 57.1% of 240 picks

More head-to-heads

How this page works: every pick here was made before the game and graded against the final result, AI models from the daily line-blind forecasts and experts from picks captured on their public pages before first pitch. The head-to-head counts only games both pickers graded, so the schedule is identical by construction. Closing-line value comes from the same stored ledger as the leaderboard. Updated nightly.