GPT-5.5 vs GLM 5.2: Graded Prediction Head-to-Head | Predicted Sports
predicted sports
Pro
← All head-to-heads
Head-to-head

GPT-5.5 vs GLM 5.2

AI model vs AI model · same games, same finals, graded in public

All time Last 30 days Last 90 days

On the 141 games both have graded (all time), GPT-5.5 leads 91–85 on correct calls. The sharper cut is the 14 games where they took opposite sides: GPT-5.5 was right 10 of 14.

MLB · 116 games both graded · Jul 2 to Jul 11, 2026

GPT-5.5
70–46
60% on shared games
GLM 5.2
65–51
56% on shared games
When they took opposite sides
13 of 116 shared games
GPT-5.5 9 · GLM 5.2 4

On the 103 games they agreed, the shared side went 61–42.

UFC · 25 games both graded · Jul 11 to Jul 18, 2026

GPT-5.5
21–4
84% on shared games
GLM 5.2
20–5
80% on shared games
When they took opposite sides
1 of 25 shared games
GPT-5.5 1 · GLM 5.2 0

On the 24 games they agreed, the shared side went 20–4.

Closing-line value
GPT-5.5
+0.05 pp
beat the close 44.3% of 115 picks
GLM 5.2
+0.15 pp
beat the close 53.3% of 285 picks

More head-to-heads

GPT-5.5 vs Claude Opus 4.8 GPT-5.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash GPT-5.5 vs Grok 4.5 GPT-5.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro GPT-5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5 GPT-5.5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol Pro GPT-5.5 vs GPT-5.6 Luna Pro GPT-5.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
GLM 5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.8 GLM 5.2 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash GLM 5.2 vs Grok 4.5 GLM 5.2 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro GLM 5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 5 GLM 5.2 vs GPT-5.6 Sol Pro GLM 5.2 vs GPT-5.6 Luna Pro GLM 5.2 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

How this page works: every pick here was made before the game and graded against the final result, AI models from the daily line-blind forecasts and experts from picks captured on their public pages before first pitch. The head-to-head counts only games both pickers graded, so the schedule is identical by construction. Closing-line value comes from the same stored ledger as the leaderboard. Updated nightly.