DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM 5.3: Graded Prediction Head-to-Head | Predicted Sports
predicted sports
⚡Winning Strategies
← All head-to-heads
Head-to-head

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM 5.3

AI model vs AI model · same games, same finals, graded in public

All time Last 30 days Last 90 days

On the 122 games both have graded (last 90 days), DeepSeek V4 Pro leads 65–63 on correct calls. The sharper cut is the 14 games where they took opposite sides: DeepSeek V4 Pro was right 8 of 14.

MLB · 108 games both graded · to

DeepSeek V4 Pro
60–48
56% on shared games
GLM 5.3
57–51
53% on shared games
When they took opposite sides
13 of 108 shared games
DeepSeek V4 Pro 8 · GLM 5.3 5

On the 95 games they agreed, the shared side went –.

UFC · 14 games both graded · to

DeepSeek V4 Pro
5–9
36% on shared games
GLM 5.3
6–8
43% on shared games
When they took opposite sides
1 of 14 shared games
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0 · GLM 5.3 1

On the 13 games they agreed, the shared side went –.

Closing-line value
DeepSeek V4 Pro
+0.18 pp
beat the close 54.7% of 774 picks
GLM 5.3
-0.01 pp
beat the close 51.9% of 108 picks

More head-to-heads

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM 5.2 DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Claude Opus 4.8 DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Grok 4.5 DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Claude Sonnet 5 DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GPT-5.6 Luna Pro DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Gemini 3.6 Flash DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Gemini 3.7 Flash
GLM 5.3 vs GLM 5.2 GLM 5.3 vs Claude Opus 4.8 GLM 5.3 vs Grok 4.5 GLM 5.3 vs Claude Sonnet 5 GLM 5.3 vs GPT-5.6 Luna Pro GLM 5.3 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash GLM 5.3 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

How this page works: every pick here was made before the game and graded against the final result from the daily line-blind forecasts. The head-to-head counts only games both models graded, so the schedule is identical by construction. Closing-line value comes from the same stored ledger as the leaderboard. Updated nightly.